Behind the Times
I'd always liked the first book fairly well, though I was dubious about the insane hype of the rest of the series. I found that as a whole the series is neither as good as the crazy fangirls would have you believe nor as abysmally dreadful as the equally vocal detractors would claim. The writing is not the greatest, but the plot is engaging and kept me interested all the way through. My main complaint is that for all it is worshiped (Firefox spellcheck insists this has only one P, but it looks wrong...) as the ultimate epic romance--and yeah, there was lots of romance--I didn't find the romance terribly satisfying, for a number of reasons.
Bear in mind here that I am seriously the most diehard romantic you will ever find.
So, here are various thoughts. Books are henceforth referred to as T, NM, E, and BD because I'm tired of typing italics tags...
( Musings (& Spoilers) )
So yeah, I had some issues, but I still enjoyed the books. I will not be getting "And so the lion fell in love with the lamb" tattooed anywhere, or devoting my life to making mix CDs or music videos devoted to Edward and Bella*. But I'll probably read them again sometime when I want a nice romantic fairytale that is utterly escapist and completely absurd in terms of real life. Which is actually pretty often. I get enough real life in my actual life - I'll take nice silly fantasy in my literature, thanks. The Twilight saga will probably go in my 'guilty pleasures,' category, for books and movies and music that are so silly I really shouldn't like them, but I do :) (10 Things I Hate About You, Dirty Dancing, Empire Records and songs like "Copacabana" and "Billy, Don't Be a Hero" are also in this category...)
*(although last night right after I finished BD, when I was still in a nice daze from reading, I played around 100 games of TriPeaks while listening to music, and had some silly fun attempting to relate songs to the series. I have a very wide mix of things like oldies and bluegrass and country and 40s jazz, so this was interesting. If this sounds extremely fangirly--in my defense, I had way too much caffeine at work last night and was rather giggly...
Incidentally, if you are not a thirteen year old girl and like some nice escapist romance that is much more mature and realistic and involves a much healthier relationship and no immortality at all, read Diana Gabaldon's Outlander series, which are quite possibly my favorite books in the world. The Outlander series is also a very epic romance, with a fantasy angle, and to me, anyway, extremely satisfying for many of the reasons Twilight is not.
Also, if you like really good vampire books - which I don't actually, except for Twilight and this - definitely read Robin McKinley's Sunshine. For that matter, read anything by Robin McKinley, including her blog. Sunshine is her only vampire book, though. And it is very good. Just don't bug her about a sequel. This makes her very annoyed(see the aforementioned blog).
Ha. I've just noticed where she mentioned some books she recommends for "any squashy romantics I meet who don’t know them yet." Squashy romantics! That is totally me!
Off to watch the Twilight movie, just to complete my Twilight binge. Not a huge fan of Robert Pattinson, or at any rate the way he talks. He looks all right, I suppose. In the movie, anyway. Both he and Kristin Stewart seem to enjoy looking like homeless heroin addicts in real life. The movie is not as good as the books, but it's not bad.

hungry
pleased
excited
amused
aggravated
disappointed
fangirly
lazy
busy
productive